Hasselblad X1D-50c vs Hasselblad X2D 100C
Compare key differences and full specifications to find the camera that suits your photography.
Key differences
- Year: Hasselblad X1D-50c: 2016 ; Hasselblad X2D 100C: 2022
- Weight: Hasselblad X1D-50c: 725 g ; Hasselblad X2D 100C: 895 g
- Effective megapixels: Hasselblad X1D-50c: 50 ; Hasselblad X2D 100C: 100
Best for
Travel with less weight: Hasselblad X1D-50c (725 g).
Larger prints and more cropping detail: Hasselblad X2D 100C (100).
| Specification | Hasselblad X1D-50c | Hasselblad X2D 100C |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Model | X1D-50c | X2D 100C |
| Year | 2016 | 2022 |
| Category | — | mirrorless-medium-format |
| Body | ||
| Dimensions | 150 x 98 x 71 mm | 148.5 x 106 x 74.5 mm |
| Weight | 725 g | 895 g |
| Weight (body only) | — | 790 g |
| Sensor | ||
| Sensor type | — | BSI CMOS |
| Effective megapixels | 50 | 100 |
| Image | ||
| Max. image resolution | 8272 × 6200 | 11656 × 8742 |
| ISO | — | 64–25600 |
| RAW bit depth | — | 16 |
| Dynamic range | — | Up to 15 stops |
| Autofocus & Drive | ||
| Autofocus type | — | PDAF + CDAF |
| AF phase zones | — | 294 |
| Stabilization | ||
| In-body stabilization (IBIS) | — | Yes |
| Stabilization axes | — | 5 |
| Rated stops | — | 7 |
| Video | ||
| Video recording supported | — | No |
| Display & Viewfinder | ||
| Screen size (in) | — | 3.6 |
| Screen resolution (dots) | — | 2360000 |
| Touchscreen | — | Yes |
| Viewfinder | — | 5.76M-dot EVF |
| Viewfinder magnification | — | 1.0× |
| Storage & Connectivity | ||
| Storage slot 1 | — | CFexpress Type B |
| Internal storage | — | 1 TB SSD |
| USB | — | USB-C 3.1 Gen 2, 10 Gbps |
| Power | ||
| USB charging | — | Yes |